道路交通事故论文:道路交通事故责任主体的认定

道路交通事故论文：道路交通事故责任主体的认定

【中文摘要】道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷案件已成为当前各基层法院民商事案件中的主要案件类型之一。在司法实践中,正确认定道路交通事故责任主体对处理此类纠纷有着极为重要的理论及实践意义。鉴于司法实践中对交通事故责任主体的认定面临的诸多困境,在《侵权责任法》中,就专章立法对机动车交通事故责任主体进行了较为详细的规定,使得上述问题得到了很大程度上的统一,在审判实务中具有重要的现实意义。但是由于立法的局限性和现实生活的复杂多样性,虽然《侵权责任法》在一定程度上改变了我国原有的《民事诉讼法》及《道路交通安全法》,等法律法规过于粗略的问题,但仍然存在诸多不足。本文除了引言外,主要包括案情介绍、案件焦点与分歧意见、研究结论三个部分。引言部分：主要说明研究道路交通事故责任主体认定的实践意义。第一部分：案情介绍。主要是介绍一起道路交通事故案件的案情。包括法院对案件事实的认定、原告的诉称、被告的辩称及法院的裁判结果。第二部分：案件焦点与分歧意见。包括法院对案件焦点的归纳和双方当事人对案件的分歧意见。第三部分：研究结论。此部分为论文的核心。主要涉及以下六个方面的内容：

1、银色轿车与张华驾驶的货车之间的法律关系认定：通过对共同侵权、共同危险行为和无意思联络的数人侵权之间的分析比较,最终认定案件中两侵权车之间成立无意思联络的数人侵权。2、雇员在从事雇佣活动中发生道路交通事故时责任主体的认定：通过对《侵权责任

法》与《人身损害赔偿解释》中关于雇主责任的分析比较,最终认定雇员张华无须对在从事雇佣活动过程中致人损害的后果承担赔偿责任,应由雇主李飞对外承担全部赔偿责任。3、挂靠机动车发生道路交通事故时责任主体的认定：鉴于当前理论和实务中对挂靠机动车发生交通事故时责任主体认定上存在的争议较大,加之《侵权责任法》对此也未作出明确规定,本文从挂靠业务的性质和出发,最终认定挂靠单位应当对挂靠机动车发生交通事故时致人损害的后果承担连带责任。4、保险公司在道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷案件中诉讼地位的认定：通过对相关法律法规的分析比较,最终认定保险公司可以以承保机动车交通事故责任强制保险(以下简称交强险)为由在道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷中作为被告进入诉讼,不能以承保商业第三者责任保险为由在道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷中作为被告进入诉讼。5、机动车驾驶员肇事后逃逸时对受害人的救济：通过目前对驾驶员肇事后逃逸时对受害人权益维护上存在的制度缺失,提出应当尽快建立和完善机动车社会救助基金制度和其他社会保障机制。6、对案件的处理意见：结合对上述问题的探讨分析,就本案的处理上提出自己的看法。

【英文摘要】Nowadays, the cases of compensation for damage of traffic accidents have become one of the mainly type of civil cases in the basic people’s courts. In judical practice, tortfeasors could be properly and effectively affirmed in traffic accidents has important significance both

theoretically and practically to deal with this sort of cases. Due to the responsibility affirmation in traffic accident has involved in dilemmas in judical practice so that Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China proposes much more specific rules and provisions to handle these issues and creates

practical significance in the process of trial practice issues. However, although Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China has offset some shortages of Law of Civil Procedure and The traffic Safety Law of PRC to some extent, it still leaves much to be improved on the basis of the limitation of law and the rich diversity of life. This paper includes four

dimensions:introduction, the background of the case, case central point and different opinions, and a conclusion.ⅠA introduction of the practical significance of responsibility affirmation in traffic accident.ⅡDescribing the background of a traffic accident, which including affirmation of the case, prosecutor’s allegation and respondent’s allegation, as well the juridical result of the court.ⅢFocusing on the summary and conclusion of case central point from the court and the

disagreement between both parties.ⅣThe fourth dimension is the core of the paper and consists of six parts.a. The

identification of civil legal relationship between the silver

car and Zhang Hua’s lorry:It is affirmed that the case belongs to the number of people without meaning contact for

infringement through the analysis and comparison of

contributory infringement, joint dangerous behavior and the number of people without meaning contact for infringement.b. The identification of the tortfeasor when the employer involves in the traffic accident in the process of employment. It is affirmed that Li Fei(employer) should take all of

responsibilities of the case rather than Zhang Hua(employee) through analyzing the employer’s responsibilities on the basis of Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China and Compensation for Personal Injury explanation.c. The identification of the tortfeasor when the join-operated vehicle involves in the traffic accident:Owing to there s a great debate about the responsibility affirmation of the join-operated vehicle in traffic accident in the theory and practice, and there is no clear and specific rules and provisions in Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China, so that the paper affirms that the organization hung rely on by the join-operated lorry shall bear joint liabilities from the perspectives of quality and

purpose.d. The identification of the proceeding position of the insurance company in the case concerning personal damage

compensation with traffic accidents. It is certified that the insurance company can be regarded as the respondent based on the motor vehicle traffic accident responsibility compulsory insurance instead of business insurance through analyzing relevant law rules.e. Taking immediate measures to offer help to victims after the hit-and-run driver escape. It is necessary to consummate social assistance funds for road traffic accident function and motion pattern and other live insurance systems for lack of safeguarding the right of victims.f. Taking the above factors into consideration, a possible judgment would be provided by the paper.

【关键词】道路交通事故 责任主体 运行支配 运行利益 共同侵权 共同危险 无意思联络的数人侵权

【英文关键词】Traffic Accident Tortfeasor Operated Control Operated Profit And joint

Dangerous Contact the Number of People Without Meaning Infringement

【目录】道路交通事故责任主体的认定

6-8

12-14

14Abstract8-9引言11-1214-16摘要一、案情介绍(一) 案件焦点二、案件焦点与分歧意见(二) 分歧意见14-161. 银色轿车驾驶员与被告张

2. 本案中责任主体的认定华之间的法律关系认定14-15

153. 各责任主体之间的侵权责任大小的认定15-16

(一) 银色轿车与被告张华驾驶的货车之

(二) 雇员在从事雇佣活动中发生道

(三) 挂靠机动车发生道

(四) 保险公司在道路交

(五) 机动车驾驶人肇事

(六) 本案的处理意见

参考文献三、研究结论16-29间的法律关系认定17-19路交通事故时责任主体的认定19-20路交通事故时责任主体的认定20-23通事故案件中诉讼地位的认定23-24后逃逸时对受害人的救济24-2626-29

31-32 结语29-30致谢30-31