指导性案例司法解释化研究
指导性案例司法解释化研究
导师：
作者：
中文摘要
在我国的法律体制中存在部门立法和立法滞后，法律之间存在漏洞、模糊、矛盾的情况下，法官在适用法律时往往因缺少一个统一的标准而可能对相类似案件作出大相径庭的判决，产生所谓的“同案不同判”现象，各种不同的判决使得每一案件消耗大量的社会资源所取得的社会效益被相互冲抵，还会使社会感到无法适从，使得法制的统一性、法律的权威性与公正性荡然无存。在中国，许多案件往往仅能产生一时的轰动效应，却对整个国家的司法实践无甚意义。为了保证新型的权利纠纷及时对社会产生示范作用，《人民法院第二个五年改革纲要》正式提出了建立和完善我国的案例指导制度。目前我国的案例指导存在许多不足：如各地对案例指导的重要性认识不足，案例指导的定位未明确，最高院公布的指导性案例缺乏法律约束力，导致各地刊载的指导性案例良莠不齐、对法律的解读不一，造成民众对司法公正产生质疑。为了解决目前的这些问题，同时又能够在现有的立法体制框架下运行，本文提出了使指导性案例司法解释化这一途径。通过指导性案例的司法解释化制度可以很好地解决上述中的问题，通过这一构想，“同案异判”现象也可以得到解决，从而实现法律的统一适用。
关键词：指导性案例 司法解释 指导性案例司法解释化
Abstract
In our legal system there is the sectoral legislation and legislative lag exists between the legal loopholes, vague and contradictory situation, the judge in the application of the law is often due to the lack of a uniform standard may be different from similar cases to make judgments , resulting in so-called "co-different sub" phenomenon, a variety of judgments made in each case consumes a large amount of social resources in the social benefits achieved were offset each other, but also feel unable to fit in the community, making the unity of the rule of law, the authority and impartiality of the law no longer exist. In China, many cases are often only produce a sensational effect the moment, but ignored the judicial practice of the entire country makes sense. In order to guarantee the right to dispute the new and timely demonstration effect on society, "People's second Five-Year Reform Outline" formally proposed the establishment and improvement of the guidance system in China's case. At present, China's case there are many deficiencies in the guidance: If the case around the lack of understanding of the importance of guidance, case studies to guide the positioning is not clear, the Supreme Court case of guidance published by the lack of legally binding, resulting in published guidance throughout the case of both good and bad, and the law different interpretation, causing people to question the course of justice. In order to address these issues now, while the existing legislative framework can be run under the framework proposed in this paper to guide judicial interpretation of cases of this category. Case through the guiding judicial interpretation of the system can solve the above-mentioned problems in, through this vision, "co-different sentence" phenomenon can be resolved in order to achieve uniform application of laws.
Key words: guiding judicial interpretation of cases of cases of judicial interpretation of the guiding