2016世界大学声誉排行榜美英名校垄断TOP10
2015世界大学声誉排行榜 美英名校垄断TOP10
伦敦时间当地3月11日,英国泰晤士高等教育发布《2015世界大学声誉排行榜》。排在榜单前十名的大学毫无悬念地被美、英两国垄断,形成强大的“精英阵容”。哈佛大学仍然高居榜首;剑桥大学紧随其后;牛津大学则取代去年斯坦福的位置,位列榜单第三。麻省理工从去年的第二名掉至第四名。第五至第十名分别为斯坦福大学、加州大学伯克利分校、普林斯顿大学、耶鲁大学、加州理工学院、哥伦比亚大学。以下为本次排行榜的七大变化:
1、哈佛大学和往年一样依旧蝉联榜首
2、日本仍然保持亚洲第一强国的地位,但东京大学仍未进入榜单前十
3、中国大学中,北京大学和清华大学进步较多,但一定程度上香港大学有所退步
4、欧洲强国中的伦敦和巴黎并列第一,成为上榜大学最多的城市 5、英国的剑桥大学和牛津大学有所进步,以第二位和第三位的成绩取代了去年的麻省理工学院和斯坦福大学
6、此次排行榜中,澳洲大学有五所院校进入前100名
7、排在前50名的大学中没有韩国以及台湾大学的一席之地
此次发布的世界大学声誉排行榜与以往榜单相比较,最显著的变化体现在“金砖四国”大学表现出的巨大进步:中国的清华和北大两所高校都跻身榜单前40名;引领亚洲大学先锋的是日本东京大学,排在榜单第十二位;不太利好的一方面是:香港大学的排名今年掉出榜单前五十强,仅排在51-60这个区间内。此外,俄罗斯和巴西的高校也表现强劲。
如果说《泰晤士世界大学声誉排行榜》是学生及家长在选择大学时不可或缺的参考标准之一,那一定和它在世界范围的公允度息息相关,即泰晤士高等教育发布的榜单的权威性毋庸置疑。谈到这一点,主编Baty提到,泰晤士高等教育《2015世界大学声誉排行榜》采用世界规模最大的学术声誉调查,从10507份数据调查中取样完成。榜单调查结合了联合国的最新数据、由不同学科领域的知名学者及顶尖专家参与调查并提供支持,榜单所列大学的排名具有权威性和准确性。
面对市面上已有的、种类繁多的大学排行榜,学生及家长会经常疑惑到底该参照哪个榜单来选择自己心仪的大学,泰晤士高等教育主编Baty为大家分享的经验是:“你肯定希望自己未来进入的大学一定是一所世界知名的领先大学。因为只有这些院校能够确保为大学毕业生提供一个全世界范围被认可的学位证书,并且通过在这里的学习你能接受到良好的教育、感受到世界教育的领先水平。针对这一点,参照此次发布的世界大学声誉排行榜会是一个不错的选择,正如之前我们提到的,该榜单上所列大学的全部数据都是来自世界各地的资深学者,而不是所谓的记者或报刊杂志。”
2015世界大学声誉排行榜
2015 reputation rank
2014 reputation rank
Institution
Country / region
Harvard University
United States
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom
University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
United States
Stanford University
United States
University of California, Berkeley
United States
Princeton University
United States
Yale University
United States
California Institute of Technology
United States
Columbia University
United States
University of Chicago
United States
University of Tokyo
Japan
University of California, Los Angeles
United States
Imperial College London
United Kingdom
ETH Zürich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Switzerland
University of Toronto
Canada
University College London
United Kingdom
Johns Hopkins University
United States
University of Michigan
United States
Cornell University
United States
New York University
United States
London School of Economics and Political Science
United Kingdom
University of Pennsylvania
United States
National University of Singapore
Singapore
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Tsinghua University
China
Kyoto University
Japan
Carnegie Mellon University
United States
University of Edinburgh
United Kingdom
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
United States
King’s College London
United Kingdom
Peking University
China
University of Washington
United States
Duke University
United States
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Germany
McGill University
Canada
University of British Columbia
Canada
University of California, San Francisco
United States
Heidelberg University
Germany
University of Wisconsin-Madison
United States
University of California, San Diego
United States
Humboldt University of Berlin
Germany
University of Melbourne
Australia
University of California, Davis
United States
Karolinska Institute
Sweden
University of Texas at Austin
United States
Northwestern University
United States
?cole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Switzerland
Georgia Institute of Technology
United States
University of Manchester
United Kingdom
University of Amsterdam
Netherlands
Australian National University
Australia
Delft University of Technology
Netherlands
Free University of Berlin
Germany
University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Belgium
Panthéon-Sorbonne University – Paris 1
France
71-80
Paris-Sorbonne University – Paris 4
France
University of S?o Paulo
Brazil
Seoul National University
Republic of Korea
University of Sydney
Australia
University of California, Santa Barbara
United States
?cole Normale Supérieure
France
Leiden University
Netherlands
National Taiwan University
Taiwan
University of North Carolina*
United States
Pennsylvania State University
United States
University of Southern California
United States
Technical University of Munich
Germany
Wageningen University and Research Center
Netherlands
Boston University
United States
Brown University
United States
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Hong Kong
Michigan State University
United States
University of Minnesota
United States
National Autonomous University of Mexico
Mexico
University of Pittsburgh
United States
Purdue University
United States
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
United States
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Utrecht University
Netherlands
81-90
University of Copenhagen
Denmark
Durham University
United Kingdom
University of Helsinki
Finland
Ohio State University
United States
University of Queensland
Australia
Texas A&M University
United
University of Warwick
ingdom
71-80
Washington University in St Louis
United States
Uppsala University
Sweden
91-100
University of Bristol
United Kingdom
?cole Polytechnique
France
London Business School
United Kingdom
University of Maryland, College Park
United States
University of Massachusetts
United States
Mayo Medical School
United States
Monash University
Australia
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore
Pasteur Institute
France
RWTH Aachen University
Germany