南京大学国际经济法研究生考研考试试题
南京大学国际经济法研究生考研考试试题
南京大学1997国际经济法试题
一. 名词解释
国家豁免原则. 互惠原则. 国际贸易术语解释通则. 共同海损. 关税税则. 关税配额.GATS.
权责发生制
二. 论述题
1. 简要说明中国公司与美国公司之间的国际货物买卖关系要受到哪些法律的调整 2. 简述进口许可证制的作用与特点, 并具体说明, 在我国是否所有的商品的进口都需要经过许可
3. 什么是国际投资中的投资措施, 各国对此都规定了哪些相关的国际税则
4. 试述国际投资中合营企业的概念, 类型与特点. 并简要说明中外合资经营企业与中外合作经营企业的主要区别
三. 案例分析
1. 中国与加拿大都是的缔约国. 中国某轻工业开发公司与加拿
大某公司签定了一份关于买卖3台新闻纸机的合同, 总价款约300万美元, 合同签定后. 加拿
大某公司一直不交货, 该开发公司就从其他来源购买了相同规格的新闻纸机作为替代物,
但买入价比合同规定的价格高出50%,该开发公司要求加拿大某公司赔偿这50%的差价损失
, 请回答:
1) 中国公司是否有权撤消原合同而购买替代物? 为什么?
2) 中国公司的损害赔偿要求是否合理? 为什么?
2. 中国某土产公司对新加坡出口红枣一批, 国外开来的信用证规定为三级品质, 交货时, 中
方公司因库存三级红枣缺货, 就改装二级货, 并在商业发票上注明:二级红枣, 价格照旧, 仍
按原定的三级货价什收, 中方公司原以为所交货物品级较原定的为高，而价格不变, 对方
公司不会有异议. 但是, 买方在收到上述单据后, 声称该货系作转售他人之用, 因而无法接受中方所交的二级货, 还认为中方公司未按合同规定交
货, 因而提出索赔要求.
请回答:1)对方公司是否有权拒收货物并提出索赔要求? 为什么？
2) 中方公司能否从对方开证行收到货款? 为什么?
南大国际经济法96年试题
一. 名词解释
非歧视原则.CFR. 单证严格相符原则. 特别提款权. 单独海损. 关税减让原则. 原产地规则.
注册资本
二. 论述题
1. 试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征
2. 简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源, 并请举例说明之
3. 如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则
4. 试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容
三. 案例题(中文回答)
INTRODUCTION
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles of international trade law to support your argument
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD 1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed back an acceptance.
Questions:
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per ton to USD 2,500 per ton?
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer?
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B (an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity ,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on .So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of China and international practice
Questions: